PHD Discussions Logo

Ask, Learn and Accelerate in your PhD Research

Question Icon Post Your Answer

Question Icon

Critically discuss the role of existing theory in building your conceptual framework. When is it appropriate to develop a novel framework versus adapting an established one?

As I build my framework, I'm wrestling with a classic PhD dilemma. My literature review shows strong existing theories, but my context has unique elements. I want to be innovative but not reinvent the wheel. How do I critically decide when novelty is a scholarly necessity versus when adaptation is the more rigorous path?

 

All Answers (1 Answers In All)

By Yusuf ali Answered 1 year ago

This is the heart of a PhD's contribution. I would recommend a two-pronged test. First, examine explanatory power: does an existing theory fully explain the key relationships or anomalies in your phenomenon? If there's a major gap, novelty is needed. Second, consider contextual fit: are you applying a theory to a radically new population or setting where its assumptions may not hold? I have seen brilliant dissertations that elegantly extend a classic theory to a new domain. The key is to explicitly justify your choice adaptation is not a lesser route if it yields new insight.

Your Answer