PHD Discussions Logo

Ask, Learn and Accelerate in your PhD Research

Question Icon Post Your Answer

Question Icon

6 months ago in Thematic Analysis By JasonDer

How would you handle

How would you manage "deviant" or "disconfirming cases"—data that does not align with your themes—and why is actively identifying and addressing these cases considered a sign of analytical rigor?

All Answers (1 Answers In All)

By Varnitha Answered 2 months ago

I would document and analytically engage with deviant cases, exploring why they differ. This may refine themes or add necessary nuance. Actively addressing them is a key marker of rigor as it challenges initial interpretations, tests theme robustness, and significantly strengthens the credibility of the analysis.  

Your Answer