Post Your Answer
2 years ago in Scholarly Contribution By Kriya
Can a negative or null result constitute a meaningful scholarly contribution, or will journals automatically reject it?
My carefully designed three-year experiment found no significant effect, contradicting several prominent theories. My supervisor says it's a "file drawer" result, but I think the finding is important—it challenges assumptions. Is it possible to publish this, and if so, how do I position the contribution?
All Answers (1 Answers In All)
By Angel Answered 3 weeks ago
Absolutely—a well-executed null result is a vital contribution, though it requires strategic framing. The contribution shifts from a discovery to a methodological or corrective one. Your paper must first establish its own high methodological rigor to be credible. Then, frame the contribution clearly: you have conducted the most comprehensive test to date of Theory X, and your results impose important boundary conditions or challenge a presumed effect. This helps prevent other researchers from wasting resources. Target journals that explicitly welcome replication or null-result studies, or journals dedicated to your method. In the discussion, focus on what the field should stop assuming or investigate differently because of your work. This turns a "failed" experiment into a crucial course correction for the discipline.
Reply to Angel
Related Questions