PHD Discussions Logo

Ask, Learn and Accelerate in your PhD Research

Question Icon Post Your Answer

Question Icon

2 years ago in Scholarly Contribution By Manoj

In collaborative science, how do you differentiate your individual scholarly contribution from the team’s contribution for things like promotion or award applications?

I was one of 50 co-authors on a major Nature paper. While thrilled, I'm now struggling to describe my specific role in grant and promotion applications. How do I credibly claim my slice of the contribution without overstating or underselling my work?

All Answers (1 Answers In All)

By Amardeep Singh Answered 3 weeks ago

In today's collaborative landscape, this is an essential skill. First, refer to the contributor roles taxonomy (CRediT) used by many journals—identify which of the 14 roles (e.g., Formal Analysis, Software, Writing – Original Draft) were yours. For promotion files, go beyond the list. Write a short paragraph: "Within the larger team's effort to achieve [Overall Goal], my specific contribution was to [Your Specific Task, e.g., develop the algorithm for Y, which was critical for validating hypothesis Z]. This involved [Brief technical detail], and my work directly enabled the finding reported in Figure 3." Link your named effort to a specific, verifiable outcome in the paper. This demonstrates you understand the project's architecture and can pinpoint your indispensable intellectual role within it.

Your Answer