Post Your Answer
1 year ago in Argumentation Theory , Conceptualization By EugenNeire
How do you justify the selection of specific constructs and the proposed directions of relationships between them in your framework?
My committee is asking me to strengthen the justification for my conceptual framework. I have my constructs and proposed relationships, but they want more than "the literature suggests." As a researcher, how do I build a compelling, evidence-based case for why these specific constructs are included and why they are hypothesized to influence each other in this specific direction?
Â
All Answers (1 Answers In All)
By Rutuja Pathare Answered 2 months ago
Justification is a three-legged stool. First, use theoretical reasoning: explicitly cite established theories that logically imply your relationships. Second, use empirical precedent: cite key studies that have found similar (or contrary) relationships, explaining why you confirm or challenge them. Third, and most importantly, use logical narrative: tell a coherent story. I recommend writing: "I include Construct A because it is established as the primary antecedent to B (cite), and I propose a positive relationship to C because, as Theory X argues, this mechanism leads to that outcome." Each arrow in your diagram needs a sentence backed by these sources.
Reply to Rutuja Pathare
Related Questions