PHD Discussions Logo

Ask, Learn and Accelerate in your PhD Research

Question Icon Post Your Answer

Question Icon

2 months ago in Scholarly Publishing By Roma

What’s the real difference between an "invited" paper and a "submitted" paper in a journal special issue‑ Does it affect prestige or peer review?

I've been asked to contribute an "invited paper" to a special issue. Does this mean it bypasses normal peer review? Will it be viewed as more or less prestigious than a regular submission when I list it on my CV?

All Answers (3 Answers In All)

By Aniketh Answered 1 month ago

In my experience editing special issues, "invited" primarily means the topic was solicited, not that review is waived. An invitation is a signal of your recognized expertise, which carries prestige. However, it almost always still undergoes full peer review; the "invitation" simply guarantees the editors will send it out for evaluation, unlike a submission which might be desk-rejected. On your CV, you can list it normally. The prestige comes from being selected as a key contributor to a curated collection, which often has high visibility. The real advantage is strategic: you're aligning your work with a focused theme and network. Always confirm the review policy with the guest editor, but assume your manuscript must meet the journal's full quality standards.

Replied 1 month ago

By Roma

Thank you Aniketh. this really clears things up.

By Luv Bhatia Answered 1 month ago

From the author side, I’d add that an invited paper mostly changes how you enter the special issue, not how you’re judged. You’re being invited because the editors think your perspective fits the theme and will strengthen the collection but that doesn’t mean the paper gets a free pass. I’ve had invited papers receive tough reviews and require substantial revisions.

Where it can matter is visibility and networking. Invited contributions often come from scholars the editors already see as central to the field, and those papers tend to be read together and cited together. So the prestige is subtle: it’s about being part of the conversation the issue is trying to define, rather than about the review process itself.

Replied 1 month ago

By Roma

Thanks a lot for this really helpful to hear the author’s perspective. The point about visibility and being part of a defined conversation makes a lot of sense.

By Jane Austen Answered 1 month ago

I like to explain it this way: an invited paper reflects editorial trust, not editorial leniency. Editors invite people because they believe the work will land well with reviewers and readers, but reviewers don’t usually know or care that a paper was invited. They evaluate what’s on the page.

In terms of prestige, it’s more of a signaling effect than a formal distinction. Being invited suggests you’re on the editors’ radar as someone shaping the field. But once published, most readers see no difference at all between invited and non-invited papers in a special issue. Quality still does all the real work.

Replied 3 weeks ago

By Roma

Really appreciate this explanation it’s reassuring and grounding at the same time. The idea of “editorial trust, not leniency” is a great way to think about it. Thanks!

Your Answer