Post Your Answer
2 years ago in PhD Synopsis By Rahul K
How specific do I need to be about my expected findings or contributions in the synopsis?
I'm worried about over-promising results I can't guarantee, but I also know the committee wants to see the potential impact. Should I state expected findings boldly, or use more cautious language like "the study aims to explore..."?
All Answers (1 Answers In All)
By Ruchika Tuli Answered 1 year ago
Use a hierarchy of specificity. For methodological contributions, you can be specific: "This work will develop a novel framework for..." For empirical findings, be directional but not prescriptive: "The research aims to characterize the relationship between X and Y, which is expected to reveal patterns informing Z." Avoid claiming you "will prove" a hypothesis. Instead, focus on the knowledge gap you will address: "This study will provide the first comprehensive data on..." or "It will test the prevailing theory that..." This demonstrates you understand research is a process of discovery, not just verification. The committee wants to see you can anticipate types of outcomes and articulate their potential significance, not predict exact results.
Reply to Ruchika Tuli
Related Questions