Post Your Answer
2 years ago in Communication Studies , Research Methods , Research Papers By Mary
My DRC committee has asked me to provide a justification of my research topic‑ Is it similar to deriving a research gap or does it mean something else?
I've mapped out my gap, but now my DRC wants a formal justification. I'm unsure if I'm just restating the gap or if I need to include additional layers of argumentation. As a candidate, I want to meet their expectations precisely.
All Answers (1 Answers In All)
By Lisa Answered 2 months ago
A justification is a broader, more persuasive argument that includes your research gap as its core evidence. I've seen candidates present a clear gap but still have their justification questioned because they didn't connect it to wider significance. You must go beyond stating "this hasn't been done." You need to argue why it should be done. Link the gap to theoretical implications, practical applications, or methodological advancements. Your committee needs to see that filling this gap matters to the field. So, use the gap as your foundation, then build the justification upon it by addressing its broader impact.
Reply to Lisa
Related Questions