Post Your Answer

Hello  I would like to suggest my preference (to say biased) will be always used of qualitative approach, which often uses to elicit the phenomenon about the lived experiences. The qualitative method pokes for the stories that relate to particular responses, which in your case about the “impact of training on employees on job satisfaction.” For this, using a quantitative approach may render the process rather barren, so that I find the qualitative approach fits well. In some cases, a mixed-method approach may serve, but some of the data can be quantitatively analyzed. Your topic “impact of training on employees on job satisfaction” implants ab initio, because you’re querying whether or not the training employees obtain job satisfaction and this hypothesis is what your facts study purpose to discover.

Dear  I prefer the qualitative approach as well. To ensure you’re on the right track; ask yourself which output you wish to gain for (research aim). If you can reach your aim by answering hypothesis type research questions or you need answers to questions in how and why form, then try to fit in questions that fully answer your aim! Adapt your aim if necessary, then decide which approach is best suited

Hi, I think the qualitative methodology is the best to approach in preaching that you want to probe the gain people’s opinion and it’s also a good option to get a lot of insights about the impact had on its participants. One can get the mere perspectives about how the participant benefited out by training and also later, you can quantify it. All the best!

Hello Daniel, My simple suggestion would be, do your homework on how to quantify job satisfaction in brief, so which the psychological scale is used to answer your job satisfaction quantity. Hope, this will help with the above suggestions as well.