Post Your Answer
How to work on additions and comments in a PhD thesis?
6 years ago in Research Writing By Keshav Verma
Hi! I am in the third year of my PhD and I recently received the reviewed third draft of my thesis from my supervisor. The problem is that I am struggling with the corrections and additions that my instructor has recommended to me for my research thesis. The number of corrections and comments that he has suggested to me are so many that even looking at them is making me feel scared! At certain places he has asked me to restructure entire chapters or revise the theoretical framework used, and I absolutely can’t figure out how to make such major changes at this late a stage in my research. I mean is that even possible now !?
At many places he has just put the comment “generalisation” even though I have provided relevant data to supplement my claims. I don’t think that he even bothered to go through or read the content properly, and has just suggested extensive revisions just in order to keep me occupied. Apart from that he has made many substantial deletions from the thesis which have also reduced the word count of the entire thesis. I can’t understand why did he not suggest these large-scale revisions when I sent him the first draft of my work. I don’t even know how to begin proceeding with all these changes now! Has someone had a similar experience with their supervisor, how did you manage to deal with it?
All Answers (4 Answers In All)
By Aditi Sharma Answered 6 years ago
You seem a bit overwrought over all of this but it really isn’t that big a deal. My supervisor too has asked me to rework and rewrite portions of my thesis so many times. It doesn’t seem at all like the document I started with. But this is all part and parcel of being a researcher, you learn through these various revisions and rewrites that you make and to your research. You can look at this way, that at least after these substantial revisions you will have made, your research work will be ironclad and much more rigorous than before. Perhaps you can mention this to him, that you would have appreciated this extensive ‘feedback’ (don’t call it criticism!) earlier, while you were on the first or second draft of your writing and is it will be lot of work for you to make all these changes at this stage. And then ask him for adequate time in order to complete all the changes.
By Priyanshu Rathore Answered 6 years ago
Share Aditi Sharma 0Vote UpVote Down answered on 16 Mar 18 Can understood the really difficult situation in which you must have found yourself. It must be frightening to think of making such huge changes at this stage. I think that you should approach this by breaking the entire the entire process into smaller parts which will make it easier. Start with the really small changes first and then move onto larger ones so that you have sufficient time to build up to them, because starting by revising entire chapters and re-doing the theoretical framework will be a bit too daunting. Also I would recommend that you involve somebody else in the process (perhaps a fellow doctoral student from your field) to offer another perspective. Like you said it will be a difficult thing to do so having another set of eyes looking at the thesis as you make the changes will help your case.
By Sonali Jain Answered 6 years ago
Some supervisors are known for doing these sort of notorious things. It is entirely possible that he didn’t really go through the earlier drafts of the thesis that you sent in properly and hence hadn’t suggested any major changes earlier. Now that he has finally managed to go through the thesis, he has suggested such extensive changes, the kind that he should’ve recommended earlier. You haven’t mentioned whether you have mentioned this to him, but according to me you should definitely try to explain the difficulty of making such huge changes to your thesis so late in your course, before you begin making the changes in the document. Perhaps he will understand and relent on a few of the major ones, which will save you a lot of work. And do not forget to address each and every one of his comments this time, so that in later drafts you don’t have to make these huge revisions and rewrites. All the best for the conversation, I hope he agrees!
By Keshav Verma Answered 6 years ago
Hi! Thank you for taking out the time to respond to my queries, it has been very consoling for me to hear that other people have also had similar experiences. I had begun to feel rather depressed about this whole business, and been feeling that I’m the only one who has had such a horrid experience with their supervisor. And yes, I will try talking him out of some of the suggestions for the rewrites of entire chapters that he has made. I plan to tell him clearly that I cannot do it as it will entirely revamp the structure and nature of the thesis, and will require me to collect fresh data hence these changes can’t be made. Hopefully he will show a little consideration and agree to cancel some of the changes at least. Even that would be a great help for me at this stage!
asked at 06 Oct, 2020 10:27 in Research Writing By Mayank Singh
asked at 10 Jan, 2020 12:00 in Research Writing By Priya
asked at 10 Jan, 2020 03:00 in Research Writing By Pavitra
asked at 08 Jan, 2020 15:32 in Research Writing By Veena
asked at 20 Nov, 2019 02:56 in Research Writing By Dharnas
asked at 06 Nov, 2019 10:17 in Research Writing By Trisha
asked at 20 Oct, 2019 11:57 in Research Writing By Anu
asked at 23 Jun, 2019 10:14 in Research Writing By Himanshu
asked at 28 May, 2019 04:13 in Research Writing By Nisha Singh
asked at 25 May, 2019 04:05 in Research Writing By Sal Gray
asked at 18 May, 2019 11:01 in Research Writing By Buchiramulu Batta
asked at 18 May, 2019 07:46 in Research Writing By Venu R
asked at 15 May, 2019 12:13 in Research Writing By Aarthi S
asked at 11 May, 2019 04:54 in Research Writing By Ritesh Tomar
asked at 11 May, 2019 01:03 in Research Writing By Geeta Ghadage
718329 Bhagirathi Bisht
Query regarding image processing
654385 Sonam Bhatia
750553 Muhammad Umar Farooq
Disagreements between my supervisor and me
774127 Anju Mehera
717126 Muhammad Umar Farooq
Difference between multivariate and bivariate analysis
852684 Lalit Mudra
697811 Rahul Kohli
711336 Raghav V
Peer reviews are reliable or not?
679499 Priyanshu Rathore
- Angular
- Research Objectives
- PhD Admissions
- Action Research
- APA Style
- Annexure I Journals
- Academic Writing
- Abstract
- Architecture
- Architecture
- Assignments
- Bibliography
- Case Study
- Citations
- Concept Matrix
- Concept Paper
- Conceptual Framework
- Conclusion
- Content Analysis
- Corrections
- Cross Sectional Study
- CST Software
- PhD Data
- Data analysis
- Data Collection
- Data Analysis
- Descriptive Statistics
- Design
- Discussion
- Dissertation
- Draft
- Editing
- Empirical Paper
- Engineering
- English literature
- Ethnobotanical
- Ethnographic Method
- Excel
- Executive Summary
- Financial analysis
- Formatting
- Grammarly
- Grounded theory
- Guidelines
- HR
- Hypothesis
- Impact Factor Journals
- Interview
- Introduction
- Java
- Journal
- LabVIEW
- Latex
- Literary Analysis Techniques
- Literature
- Literature Review
- Longitudinal study
- Management
- Material for study
- Matlab
- Methodology
- MLA Format
- MLA Style
- Objectives
- Peer Review
- Paper Publication
- PhD
- PhD Funding
- PhD Interview
- PhD planner
- PhD Thesis
- PhD Management
- Pilot Study
- Plagiarism Check
- Presentation
- Psychology
- Qualitative Data
- Quantitative methods
- Qualitative Method
- Qualitative research
- Qualitative Research
- Quantitative research
- Questionnaire
- References
- Referencing
- Report Writing
- Research design
- Research Methodology
- Research methods
- Research objective
- Research Paper
- Research philosophy
- Research Problem
- Research Proposal
- Research Question
- Research Hypotheses
- Review Paper
- Revisions
- Sample
- SCI Journals
- Secondary Data Analysis
- Secondary Source
- Software
- Software for Plagiarism
- SPSS
- SQL
- SSCI Journals
- STATA
- Statistical Tests
- Structural Analysis
- SWOT Analysis
- Synopsis
- Technical Writing
- Thematic Analysis
- Thomson Reuters
- Topic
- Topic Selection
- Turnitin
- University Guidelines
- Variables
- Writing
- Writing Editing
- Testtag
- Dissertation
- Simulation
- Coding
- Scientific Manuscript
- Algorithms
- Design
- Software
- Statistical Analysis
- Analysis
- Supervising
- Parametric Test
- Parameter
- Submission
- Base Paper
- Interpretation
- Dissipation Systems
- Data Science
- Machine Learning
- Hybrid Electric
- Power Control
- ArcGiS
- Spatial Analysis
- Switching
- Simulink
- Artificial Intelligence
- Deep Learning
- Panel Data
- Reliability
- Pandemic
- COVID-19
- HRM
- Ansys
- Multiphase Flow Modelling
- Remote Sensing Software
- ENVI
- Qualitative Research
- Thinking
- Likert Scale
- Scale Construction
- Sample Size
- Methodology
- Questionnaire
- Regression
- Linear Equation
- Linear Programming
- Wireless Communications
- Digital Communications
- Wireless Network
- Publications
- Publications
- Scientific Research
- Convergent Variant
- Conferences
- Conferences
- Abstracts
- Bioinformatics
- Differential Gene
- Survey
- Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
- Research Design
- Writing
- Microsoft Windows
- Student
- Circuits
- Digital
- Serum
- Plasma
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Solar Collector
- Heat Transfer
- Radiation
- API
- Python
- Research Paper
- Design Thinking
- Training
- Psychology
- Python
- R Programming
- Primer
- Journal Impact Factor
- Conferences
- Big Data
- Cloud Computing
- Human Behavior
- Structural Equation Modelling
- SEM Analysis
- Applied Mathematics
- Dynamical Systems
- Statistics
- Blockchain
- Testing
- Publications
- Amos
- EViews
- NS2
- NS3
- Data Analysis Tool
- Conceptual Framework
- CST Software
- Dissertation
- Indroduction
- Structural Analysis
- Renewable Energy
- Medicine
- AI Model
- science experiments
- FUTURE TECH